News & Updates

FA proposals for youth football – one step to go

Football Association plans for a radical overhaul of youth football in England are just one step away from becoming reality.

The youth development proposals include a revised player pathway focused on small-sided football – including new 5v5 and 9v9 formats – up to the under 12s age group and a child-friendly approach to competition up to under 11s.

The ambitious plans received the approval of the FA Council earlier this month, leaving just one more hurdle to negotiate – a vote by FA shareholders at the AGM on 28 May – before work can begin on implementing the proposals.

If 75% of FA shareholders approve the rule changes relating to the revised player pathway and new competition formats then they will become mandatory practice, being phased in from the youngest age groups from the 2013/14 season onwards.

The most controversial element of the original proposals – a de-coupling of school and grassroots football age groups to combat the Relative Age Effect – was omitted from the proposals put to FA Council, although the FA will revisit this issue in due course.

For Nick Levett, the FA’s National Development Manager for Youth and Mini Soccer and the man behind the proposals, the AGM vote represents the final hurdle of a two and a half year project featuring extensive research and a nationwide consultation procedure, including over 125 events and engaging over 4,000 parents and coaches.

“I think we’re in a good place,” Levett told Club Website. “I hope that we’ve done enough. This is the next 15 to 20 years of youth football we’re talking about here.”

“[LMA Chairman and author of the FA's 1997 Charter for Quality] Howard Wilkinson stood up at the Council meeting and said that this was the most exciting and aspirational piece of work that he’d seen the FA do in years.

“If he recognises that it’s the right thing to do for the development and support of young players in the game, then we must be on the right track.”

The omission of the Relative Age Effect element of the proposals represents the biggest change to the FA’s final recommendations published in January.

This exclusion, says Levett, was due to “some concerns around it being the right solution, so it was decided it was best not to take that forward.

“That doesn’t mean that it’s off the agenda. It’s still a hugely important thing that we need to address. We can’t pretend it doesn’t exist, but maybe that wasn’t the right solution.”

Levett concedes that, were it down to him, the proposals being put forward to FA stakeholders might look slightly different, but he is happy that they represent the views of the majority of the grassroots community – the very point behind the FA’s extensive consultation.

Whilst the original plans may have been whittled down, the two proposals being put to the vote on 28 May still represent the biggest change to youth football since the introduction of mini soccer in 1999 – and they arguably go way beyond that.

If voted in, for the first time ever children will only begin to play on full size pitches at under 13s level while, for teams up to under 11s, the traditional league format will be replaced by three six-week ‘trophy events’, allowing all teams to play ‘competitive’ football for 18 weeks of a 26 week season, rather than all compete for a single league trophy over an entire season.

Club Website will bring you further details of the two elements of the proposals before the AGM on 28 May, so watch this space over the coming weeks for more details of what’s in store.

Got a question? Let us have it!

If you have any questions on the final proposals, please leave us a comment below. We’ll collate your feedback and will put your queries to Nick Levett and his team.

COMMENTS

Jenny says:

Does anyone know whether the relative age effect is still going ahead?

Thanks

April 10, 2013 at 22:14

Mikey says:

Hi,

I have read this article and thought I would weigh in with my own thoughts having been through the current youth system as it is. I had trials with Liverpool and Chelsea before signing for a lower league club, and played in the quarter final of the Youth Cup at Anfield. I’d like to discuss the ‘Relative age effect’.

I am an August birthday, the 17th to be precise, and I cannot emphasise enough how much of a hindrance it was throughout my career. In my age group I was always a handy player and deemed ‘good enough’ (at Academy level not locally) however in the age group below I was quite noticeably faster, stronger even taller relatively speaking and was probably the best player. It dawned on me quite early how important something as negligible as your birthday was in ‘making it’.

Some coaches seemed to consider it a factor and others dismissed it out of hand. I am also inclined to agree with the article where it is not about the DOB as such but more the physical maturity of young players.

Ultimately, I don’t know how much of an effect it had on my development as I grew up getting a taste of both environments but I firmly believe it is a problem that needs to be addressed. Even now, I think September/October birthdays will be signed to Academies whilst there will be better ‘pound-for-pound’ July/August birthdays sat at home unattached.

July 15, 2012 at 05:36

Dominion says:

Show me how to write football proposal to schools and to convince principal

July 14, 2012 at 08:43

Zygmund says:

Lets look at this situation in another way.Coaching certificates are ok but i fear that they teach more about paperwork than football.There are many older more experienced coaches who cut themselves adrift from the FA because of the way they are treated,why not pool these guys and have them pass on their experiences to younger coaches.I have for many years been teaching boys to play three aside with the futball de salao balls.No goalkeepers and the game starts from a ball being played wide.games consist, as they progress of playing touch football with more players but still no goals just passes to make points.Players learn so much more about pass and movement this way and you can adjust pitch sizes to suite.

July 2, 2012 at 22:51

Alan Willis says:

Sadly, the win at all costs mentality is not just down to the would-be Mourinhos. Parents also have such a big influence over the footballing dreams of their kids.
At a recent u14 Cup final, a group of parents were asked if they would like to buy a cup final programme (just£1 each). They replied, ‘Only if we win’.
Truly staggering. What hope do their children have in football and also, in life?

May 28, 2012 at 16:28

Marc T says:

Stuart, I could not agree more with your comments.. My son is just heading into the U9 category and we have moved him from the club he was at due to the “politics”, coaches berating kids for making mistakes, for trying to make it all about winning, then excluding a group of boys because “they were not good enough”. I find this attitude disgusting and unacceptable in this day and age and I hope the FA or local County FA have some power to take some action. My son was told he had no chance of being selected for the team he had played for, for 2 years because someone had heard that he had been to the trials of two other clubs in the previous 2 weeks.. Part of the reason for looking at alternate clubs was my difficulty getting him to training due to work commitments, so we looked at clubs who train on a Saturday… for his current club to hold that against an 8 year old boy is wrong.. The Herts FA will have a full report on this sorry incident in the next few days….

May 28, 2012 at 09:46

Leave a comment